Siux Fenix Pro 2026 vs Siux Fenix Pro 4

Finden Sie Ihren perfekten Schläger. Vergleichen Sie Eigenschaften und Bewertungen nebeneinander.

Bewertungen

Power
Ausgezeichnet (9.5)
Ausgezeichnet (9.6)
Kontrolle
Gut (7)
Sehr gut (7.5)
Fehlerverzeihung
Gut (6.7)
Sehr gut (8)
Handling
Gut (7)
Gut (7)
Komfort
Gut (7)
Gut (6.8)

Spezifikationen

Form
DiamondDiamond
Gewicht
355–375 g355–375 g
Spielgefühl
HardMedium Hard
Balance
-High
Kern
EVA RubberEVA Hard
Schlagflächen
12K Carbon Fiber21K Carbon
Rahmen
Carbon3K Aramid
Niveau
AdvancedAdvanced to Professional
Siux Fenix Pro 2026

The Siux Fenix Pro 2026 is a specialist tool: clean preparation and a full swing unlock explosive smash and overhead output, but it does not disguise a late swing or a mistimed shot. Defense and off-center contact are where the trade-offs show up, and net play rewards early positioning over reactive blocking. It fits advanced, attacking players who already generate their own pace and want a racket that adds finishing weight to shots they can produce reliably. Anyone still building consistent mechanics, or looking for a racket to cover for imperfect contact, will find more resistance here than support.

Vorteile
  • High power ceiling on smashes and overheads.
  • Heavy, direct volley response with spin potential.
  • Sharp bandeja and víbora on clean contact.
  • Frame resists twisting structurally.
Nachteile
  • Defensive lobs can land short; off-center contact is penalised quickly.
  • Head-heavy balance slows reactions in fast net exchanges.
  • Power needs active swing speed; little assistance on slower swings.
  • Comfort declines under fatigue or mistimed contact.
  • Stock grip described as thin; most players will want an overgrip.
Siux Fenix Pro 4

Carrying a 21K Carbon face, a 3K Aramid frame, and an EVA Hard core on a head heavy diamond build, the Siux Fenix Pro 4 2024 commits fully to attacking play as the top of Siux's Fenix range. The smash and net game show the clearest returns, backed by a frame that holds up under repeated hard contact, while defense and off centre contact ask more of the player than a softer racket would. It suits advanced to professional players who already generate their own pace and want a dedicated power tool, while a player chasing a wider margin for error is better served by the Fenix Lite 4 or a softer racket elsewhere in Siux's range.

Vorteile
  • 21K Carbon face and head heavy balance produce real pace on the smash.
  • 3K Aramid frame holds up under repeated hard impacts without losing rigidity.
  • Elevated sweet spot placement helps on a clean, well placed shot.
  • Shiny 3D Finish adds real bite on sliced shots and kick smashes.
Nachteile
  • Head heavy balance and stiff carbon construction ask for early preparation on defense.
  • Off centre contact costs pace and precision quickly given the firm, power first build.
  • Maneuverability trails a lighter, more evenly balanced racket in a fast exchange.
  • Not built for a player still developing consistent, repeatable technique.

Abonnieren Sie die Padelmesh-Updates

News, Materialtests und Guides von Spielern und Trainern – direkt in Ihr Postfach.

Häufig gesucht

Die Padel-Tests auf Padelmesh entstehen auf dem Platz: Jeder Schläger wird nach denselben Kriterien geprüft, sodass sich Power, Kontrolle, Balance und Komfort direkt vergleichen lassen – ohne sich auf Werbeversprechen zu verlassen.

Steht der Schläger fest, fehlt nur noch ein Court zum Ausprobieren. Padelmesh führt Padel-Clubs, Trainer und Clubketten in Dutzenden Ländern zusammen.

Gewinnen Sie einen NOX AT10 Luxury Genius 18K Alum Padelschläger