NOX AT10 Luxury Genius Attack 12K Alum Xtrem 2026 vs Siux Fenix Pro 4

Finden Sie Ihren perfekten Schläger. Vergleichen Sie Eigenschaften und Bewertungen nebeneinander.

Bewertungen

Power
Ausgezeichnet (9)
Ausgezeichnet (9.6)
Kontrolle
Sehr gut (7.8)
Sehr gut (7.5)
Fehlerverzeihung
Gut (6.5)
Sehr gut (8)
Handling
Gut (7)
Gut (7)
Komfort
Gut (6)
Gut (6.8)

Spezifikationen

Form
DiamondDiamond
Gewicht
360–375 g355–375 g
Spielgefühl
HardMedium Hard
Balance
-High
Kern
HR3 Black EVAEVA Hard
Schlagflächen
Carbon Fiber 12K Alum Xtrem21K Carbon
Rahmen
Carbon fiber3K Aramid
Niveau
ProfessionalAdvanced to Professional
NOX AT10 Luxury Genius Attack 12K Alum Xtrem 2026

This racket is a specialist tool built for finishing points from the net and overhead. It fits players who already spend most of a point moving forward and have the timing to back that up. Anyone still building consistent technique, managing arm sensitivity, or playing a primarily defensive game will find more resistance than support here. For that specific attacking profile, the racket delivers what it's built for; for most other styles, the demands are likely to outweigh the reward.

Vorteile
  • High, accessible overhead and smash pace.
  • Stable, direct response in fast net exchanges.
  • Strong bite and spin from the Dual Spin surface.
  • Adjustable balance via 2 g and 4 g counterweights.
Nachteile
  • Compact, high sweet spot that punishes off-center contact.
  • Limited assistance on defensive shots taken low or late.
  • Reduced maneuverability in quick net exchanges.
  • More vibration transmitted on mishits.
  • Physically demanding to sustain at full output across a whole match.
Siux Fenix Pro 4

Carrying a 21K Carbon face, a 3K Aramid frame, and an EVA Hard core on a head heavy diamond build, the Siux Fenix Pro 4 2024 commits fully to attacking play as the top of Siux's Fenix range. The smash and net game show the clearest returns, backed by a frame that holds up under repeated hard contact, while defense and off centre contact ask more of the player than a softer racket would. It suits advanced to professional players who already generate their own pace and want a dedicated power tool, while a player chasing a wider margin for error is better served by the Fenix Lite 4 or a softer racket elsewhere in Siux's range.

Vorteile
  • 21K Carbon face and head heavy balance produce real pace on the smash.
  • 3K Aramid frame holds up under repeated hard impacts without losing rigidity.
  • Elevated sweet spot placement helps on a clean, well placed shot.
  • Shiny 3D Finish adds real bite on sliced shots and kick smashes.
Nachteile
  • Head heavy balance and stiff carbon construction ask for early preparation on defense.
  • Off centre contact costs pace and precision quickly given the firm, power first build.
  • Maneuverability trails a lighter, more evenly balanced racket in a fast exchange.
  • Not built for a player still developing consistent, repeatable technique.

Abonnieren Sie die Padelmesh-Updates

News, Materialtests und Guides von Spielern und Trainern – direkt in Ihr Postfach.

Häufig gesucht

Die Padel-Tests auf Padelmesh entstehen auf dem Platz: Jeder Schläger wird nach denselben Kriterien geprüft, sodass sich Power, Kontrolle, Balance und Komfort direkt vergleichen lassen – ohne sich auf Werbeversprechen zu verlassen.

Steht der Schläger fest, fehlt nur noch ein Court zum Ausprobieren. Padelmesh führt Padel-Clubs, Trainer und Clubketten in Dutzenden Ländern zusammen.

Gewinnen Sie einen NOX AT10 Luxury Genius 18K Alum Padelschläger