Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 2026 vs Siux Fenix Pro 4

Finden Sie Ihren perfekten Schläger. Vergleichen Sie Eigenschaften und Bewertungen nebeneinander.

Bewertungen

Power
Ausgezeichnet (9.5)
Ausgezeichnet (9.6)
Kontrolle
Sehr gut (8.5)
Sehr gut (7.5)
Fehlerverzeihung
Gut (6)
Sehr gut (8)
Handling
Gut (7)
Gut (7)
Komfort
Gut (6)
Gut (6.8)

Spezifikationen

Form
DiamondDiamond
Gewicht
370 g (± 10 g)355–375 g
Spielgefühl
HardMedium Hard
Balance
-High
Kern
Hard EVAEVA Hard
Schlagflächen
3K Carbon21K Carbon
Rahmen
Carbon3K Aramid
Niveau
AdvancedAdvanced to Professional
Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 2026

The Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 delivers an attacking diamond identity built on 3K Carbon faces, a carbon frame, and a Hard EVA core with an integrated Carbon Power Layer. It rewards advanced attackers who finish points at the net, on the bandeja and víbora, and on the smash, while asking for clean technique and offering little help in defense or on off centre contact. Players who want serious pace and accept a firm, demanding response are the clearest fit.

Vorteile
  • Strong output on aggressive shots and clean contact.
  • Stable on heavy impacts, resists twisting at the net.
  • Heavy, fast volleys and a strong smash.
  • Carbon Power Layer adds reactivity at higher swing speeds.
Nachteile
  • Sweet spot is not generous; off centre contact loses quality quickly.
  • Defense demands extra work and clean preparation.
  • Hard feel loads the arm over long sessions.
Siux Fenix Pro 4

Carrying a 21K Carbon face, a 3K Aramid frame, and an EVA Hard core on a head heavy diamond build, the Siux Fenix Pro 4 2024 commits fully to attacking play as the top of Siux's Fenix range. The smash and net game show the clearest returns, backed by a frame that holds up under repeated hard contact, while defense and off centre contact ask more of the player than a softer racket would. It suits advanced to professional players who already generate their own pace and want a dedicated power tool, while a player chasing a wider margin for error is better served by the Fenix Lite 4 or a softer racket elsewhere in Siux's range.

Vorteile
  • 21K Carbon face and head heavy balance produce real pace on the smash.
  • 3K Aramid frame holds up under repeated hard impacts without losing rigidity.
  • Elevated sweet spot placement helps on a clean, well placed shot.
  • Shiny 3D Finish adds real bite on sliced shots and kick smashes.
Nachteile
  • Head heavy balance and stiff carbon construction ask for early preparation on defense.
  • Off centre contact costs pace and precision quickly given the firm, power first build.
  • Maneuverability trails a lighter, more evenly balanced racket in a fast exchange.
  • Not built for a player still developing consistent, repeatable technique.

Abonnieren Sie die Padelmesh-Updates

News, Materialtests und Guides von Spielern und Trainern – direkt in Ihr Postfach.

Häufig gesucht

Die Padel-Tests auf Padelmesh entstehen auf dem Platz: Jeder Schläger wird nach denselben Kriterien geprüft, sodass sich Power, Kontrolle, Balance und Komfort direkt vergleichen lassen – ohne sich auf Werbeversprechen zu verlassen.

Steht der Schläger fest, fehlt nur noch ein Court zum Ausprobieren. Padelmesh führt Padel-Clubs, Trainer und Clubketten in Dutzenden Ländern zusammen.

Gewinnen Sie einen NOX AT10 Luxury Genius 18K Alum Padelschläger